Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW

Health Insurance: Fighting the Lies (Updated 9/14/09)
House Forecast: 242.4 (-14.6)

Senate Forecast: 57.1 (-2.9)



2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated389
Confirmed293
Last Updated 12/21/09

Follow DCW on Twitter
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Jesse Jackson has a good idea

by: DocJess

Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:00:00 AM EST


Jesse Jackson had an op-ed in yesterday's USA Today (20 February, page 9A). His idea is that since banks now borrow money at 1%, allow college loans at 1%. He points out that while most people used to go to college on 2/3 grant money and 1/3 loans, that has now been reversed. He wrote:

There is real perversity here

Thanks to government aid, General Motors is offering car loans at 0% while students seeking to get an education pay at least 5%. students are essentially subsidizing the banks that drove us into this ditch. 

He couldn't be more right.

Above his op-ed is Al Neuthart's piece. (He founded the paper.) He wrote:

Work programs mentioned so far mostly are in man-oriented construction and engineering. We must also offer opportunities in areas like education and health care, which not only attract more women, it's where they have more opportunities to rise in the ranks.

Most important, President Obama must guard against the stimulus plan's implementation becoming sexist, as was President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Works Progress Administration (WPA) during the Great Depression on the 1930's. 

Then, I was a kid living in the little prairie town of Alpena, S.D. These signs were posted at the WPA swimming pool and park project next to the public school:

   Men $5 a day
   Women $3 a day

Because sexist white males were in charge, the didn't hire any women, even at the lower rate. So my widowed mother, Christina, worked for $1 a day washing dishes at the local U&I Cafe.

Walking to and from school seeing those government signs every day made me vow that if I ever got to do any hiring, it would be discrimination-free. That's a pledge I ketp while supervising employment of tens of thousands over a 35-year period. 

Education for all, opportunity for all. What a concept. 

DocJess :: Jesse Jackson has a good idea
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
on the other hand (0.00 / 0)

On the other hand, I read an analysis somewhere just recently that some of the stuff in the stimulus bill aids women disproportionately - unemplyment changes for part time workers and so forth.

Not saying this is right, just that there doesn't seem to have been a lot of thought processes attached to the gender aspect in either direction. 

Also, I thought education, which is still mostly female pre-college, was getting a pile of money. And aren't there federal laws against discrimination against women in government construction jobs?



Neuthart may be reacting to GOP talking points (0.00 / 0)
Unsurprisingly, many Republicans complained about the education and health care parts (work but not jobs, or whatever nonsense Steele said), implying that only the male-dominated fields are "real" work. Although I didn't see the analysis you were talking about, Trudy, the package as it turned out doesn't look skewed one way or another in the big ticket items.

As far as federal laws against discriminating against women in construction jobs, that doesn't mean that if the bill had only funded construction jobs it would be gender-neutral. If a hypothetical bill were to somehow fund ice hockey and tennis programs but not basketball and track, we'd be a little suspicious of the racial distribution, just because of the demographic realities currently in place in those sports.


[ Parent ]



Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 4 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

custom counter

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox