Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW


Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention Charlotte Host Committee
DNCC
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version




Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

PA Voter ID Case: Decision Due this Week

by: DocJess

Mon Aug 13, 2012 at 05:33:41 AM EDT


Sometime this week (hopefully today) Judge Robert E. Simpson Jr. will decide whether to uphold or strike down the Voter ID case in front of him. He basically has 3 options: to strike the law down as unconstitutional under the Pennsylvania constitution, find the law constitutional but find that implementing it before the November 2012 election is onerous enough to delay implementation until after this election, or uphold the law. No matter which option he chooses, the next step from the losing side will be to file an appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Normally, the Supreme Court has seven members, but since Joan Orie Melvin is under indictment, there are only six. As an aside, Joan's sister Jane is already in jail, and their unindicted co-conspirator (since high school) is currently governor of the state, but I digress. The Supremes are evenly split between Democrats and Republicans, although Chief Justice Ron Castille (R) has been known, at times, to rule against his party. If Simpson rules to strike down the law, the vote can split 3-3, and Simpson's ruling will stand, because the rule of law is that ties go to the lower court judgement. If, however, he rules to uphold the law, it would all come down to Ron Castille as to whether Simpson's ruling stands or is overturned. While Castille has given no indication of how he will rule, it is likely that he will not want history to remember him as the man who denied suffrage to a million plus Pennsylvanians.

As to how Simpson will rule on the initial filing? He has a history of being fair, so my gut (for whatever that's worth) says he'll rule to overturn the law in sum toto as the state's case was weak, at best, and the plaintiffs not only made a great case, but also decimated the state's witnesses, up to and including getting Carol Aichele to admit she didn't even know what the law said, as she'd never read it. (Aichele, by the way, is the Secretary of the Commonwealth.) Simpson was a Democrat, and appointed to the bench by Bob Casey, Sr., who appointed him to fill out a term. Simpson then ran for a full term. Since all Pennsylvania judge candidates can cross-file in the primary, Simpson did. He ended up winning the Republican primary, but not the Democratic primary, so he switched parties. 

Fingers crossed, kids. 

DocJess :: PA Voter ID Case: Decision Due this Week

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

looks like he wants to stay republican (0.00 / 0)
hope ron comes through. recent polling shows Obama up nearly 10 pts in pa. could this actually hand the state to romney?


Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account


Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox