Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW

Health Insurance: Fighting the Lies (Updated 9/14/09)
House Forecast: 242.4 (-14.6)

Senate Forecast: 57.1 (-2.9)



2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated408
Confirmed339
Last Updated 3/12/10

Follow DCW on Twitter
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Is Perry v Hutchison a Parable for 2012?

by: DocJess

Thu Oct 15, 2009 at 05:00:00 AM EDT


I was watching clips from the Rush Limbaugh interview with NBC, as, of course, presented by Keith Olbermann. And I started thinking NOT about who is in charge over there in wingnutland, but about Texas. 

I've written a lot about Rick Perry: his disdain for education, his refusal to accept science, his perversion of the law and justice in the Cameron Todd Willingham case. And most of all, about the secession comment. Rick was once a moderate (as in, he wanted HPV vaccines mandatory) but he's swung uber right.  I'd consider Kay Bailey Hutchison right wing, but compared to Rick's recent actions, she's coming off moderate.  The most recent polling is from Rasmussen in September, and shows Rick at 38% and Kay at 40%. Teabagger Debra Medina polls at 3%. (she has Ron Paul's support, although not his official endorsement.) 

So the question becomes, is the Texas Republican primary the first true battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party? No major endorsements are out yet, so we don't know how Bush, Gingrich, Cheney, Delay, Limbaugh, Beck, Palin and the rest will align. (I'm betting Spunky comes out for Rick, if for no other reason than he was with her when she ostensibly went into labor and flew home to Alaska. Sorry, couldn't help myself.)  

The thing of note is that the Republican primaries are open, meaning non-Republicans can vote in them. And while Rick is shoring up the base, Kay is going after the moderates, and possibly even Independents who don't want to see Texas blue. In a recent speech, she said

"If Texas goes Democrat, we will never elect a Republican president again -- not ever," she said. "We cannot do it." 

That's scary to a lot of people who believe they "vote for the candidate, not the party" and want to ensure that both parties survive.

To win, Kay will need not just rhetoric, but an issue or two. Rick may have handed her one in the Willingham case. He originally fired 3 of 9 Forensic Board members, and then fired the last he could. (The other 5 are not appointed by the governor.) New information indicates that even before Willingham's execution, Rick was made aware that the evidence had been tainted, and the analysis should have been discredited. Thus, the firing of the board is not just to protect his previous decision to not stay the execution, but may also be to prevent a gross miscarriage of justice from coming to light. 

Kay's on that

"I am a supporter of the death penalty, but I also believe that 100 percent of the people who also believe the death penalty is a deterrent think we need to have all of the evidence and all of the technology to assure that when such a punishment is given that we have all of the evidence and the capability to assure that the person is guilty.

"I definitely disagree with the governor changing the commission just before the hearing that would perhaps lend some light on the technology that would determine whether arson was a factor.

"It's another case where the governor is trying to maintain a loyalty to him but not to the responsibility person on the commission had taken to the people of Texas and our judicial system."

Imagine what she'll do when she gets wind of the fact that 88 minutes before the execution, Rick received a fax indicating Willingham was innocent.

The primary is not that far off: early voting starts in four short months and Kay still has to vote yea or nay on health reform. That may seem like a no-brainer, but if she wants to be a "moderate" and the bill is going to pass anyway, it might make her get on the bandwagon.

Another question is the effect that Debra Medina will have. Sure, she's a wingnut and a secessionist and all that. If Ron Paul actually endorses her, and uses his incredible internet money-raising prowess on her behalf, could she take enough votes from Rick to give the Republican nod to Kay? Could she take enough from both sides to force a run-off? If there is a run-off, is it possible that the Democrats would come out in force and all of a sudden Debra Medina ends up being the Republican candidate? Remember, it's not only an open primary, but an open run-off. If I were a Democrat in Texas, I'd consider voting in a Republican run-off for the candidate least likely to win against any Democrat, but that's just me. 

Still, the overriding question is whether Kay can defeat Rick, running as what passes for a moderate in wingnutland. And if so, what does that mean for other Republican primaries? And for the 2012 race? 

One scenario (since I truly doubt that Debra Medina ends up winning the Republican primary. She's got as much chance as Kinky Friedman does of winning the Democratic primary) is that Rick wins the primary, but goes down in defeat to the Democrat because Texas is not as wingnut as we all think it is. Alternately, that Kay wins the primary and then loses the general because Texas IS as wingnut as we all think, and the right stays home in protest over a candidate too "liberal" for their tastes.

Texas is trending blue. Whether the state Democrats can get it together enough to rally behind whoever wins the Democratic primary and actually spread their grasp beyond Austin, and much of Dallas and Houston is left to be seen. But within the Republican party, this may well be a bellwether for 2012. If Rick can't hold the Texas state house, it's looking pretty bad for them.

DocJess :: Is Perry v Hutchison a Parable for 2012?
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
what are the chances? (0.00 / 0)
that by the end of obama's second term texas will be blue enough to consistently elect a dem president.

Will it only get bluer? and is Kay right? if texas comes over to our side, between ex new orleans blacks and legal mexican heritage residents, and generally more progressive young voters replacing deceased conservative voters, unless california flips red, will it mean dems from now on?  


Texas is blue and will be bluer (0.00 / 0)
Texas is one of the few States that is growing. And it's growing in population in the Dem demographic. Texas's cost of living, stable housing, and jobs are drawing thousands, and hundred's of thousands of people from States like California and other blue States.  

[ Parent ]
Texas won't be blue in 2012. (0.00 / 0)
The Republicans would have to nominate a deeply flawed candidate (Steve Schmidt might suggest Sarah Palin.) and/or the Texas Republican Party would have to be deeply divided for that to happen.  The GOP would also have to maintain a similar hardline on immigration to 2008.

Back when Sotomayor was first nominated and the Republican response had yet to fully form (would they stand up to her or not), I did an analysis of the 2008 electorate with some 2012 projections. The bottom line is that it would take a perfect storm of factors for Obama to win the Lone Star state in 2012.  And that isn't even factoring in the fact that the GOP base will likely be more motivated in 2012 than they were in 2008.  I think 2012 is too early, but I might be able to be persuaded to think about 2016 or 2020.


Rules for Run-off (0.00 / 0)

Texas does not quite have an open primary or run-off.  Instead, it functionally has day of voting party registration.

When you vote in the primary, the election officials record which ballot you took (D, R, L, or other).  Whichever ballot you took, that is your party for the next two years and can't be changed.  Thus, if you voted in the Democratic Primary because you were interested in the Supreme Court race or the Land Commissioner's race or the Railroad Commissioner's race (and last time I voted in Harris County, Texas back in the early 90s, there were 60+ races on the ballot), you can't vote in the Republican run-off.

Of course, a complicating factor for the Governor's race is whether Senator Hutchinson will keep her word and resign the Senate seat.  If she does, there will be an open non-partisan primary for the Senate seat on the same day as the Governor's primary.  That might help Senator Hutchinson in the primary, but could help the Democrats in the Senate race.

Given the make-up of the Texas Republican primary (folks like my siblings), I am putting Senator Hutchinson down as a no vote on any health care bill that a Democratic could vote yes on.






Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 1 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

custom counter

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox