Welcome to Democratic Convention Watch

Donate to DCW

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
2012 GOP Superdelegate List

AP Delegate Count
Romney989
Santorum265
Gingrich130
Paul106
Unallocated58
Needed to Win: 1144

2012 Senate Forecast: 48.9

Charlotte Host Committee
DNCC
2010 Census

Follow DCW on Google+
DCW iPhone App Info
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version




Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at

Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Political Technology

by: DocJess

Tue Aug 04, 2009 at 11:34:42 AM EDT


When I went to the Town Hall on Sunday, I traveled with 3 people I'd never met before. I called a friend to ask if she knew anyone who might have room in a car, and they came and picked me up.

These folks are long-time activists. On a variety of topics going back to Vietnam. They currently, amoung other things, donate time to the phone bank for the President's health care plan.

In the car, we got into a discussion on the usefulness of phone banks now, and going forward. The opinion of these folks was that phone banks were good because they were conversational. They're happy to sit with a list of names, even as the percentage of people who pick up their calls dwindles. 

I've run phone banks, and it's a pretty simple process: each person has some training on the candidate/topic, a list of names, a pen and a phone. Ahead of time, there is a decision made as to whether to leave a message or mark "not home" on the sheet. People have access to the notebooks which contain more detailed information if anything comes up on the call that the phone banker cannot answer off the top of his/her head. 

I know from years of doing this that the percentage of people who answer their phones has dropped from close to 100% of those at home to less than 20%. I don't have published figures on that, just a gut sense from doing it for a few decades. Like most people I know, **I** don't answer my phone unless I know who is calling. I don't listen to voice mail. If a friend calls and I don't answer, they hang up, knowing I'll see that he/she called, and call back as soon as I can. If people REALLY want me NOW they text me. Mostly, I live in a world of emails. I don't know that I'm all that different from a lot of people in this regard.

So the question becomes, how do campaigns and causes reach out? 

And I don't have a good answer. I still believe in going door to door, although it's the most time consuming of outreach/grassroots efforts. Hang tags are expensive, direct mail more so. Lots of emails go directly to people's junk folders.

I read recently that there are now over 250 million people on Facebook, and about 90 million on MySpace. The number of people on Twitter grew 1382% in one year, to over 7 million in February 2009, per Nielson.  These, and other, social networking sites provide a lot of opportunity for outreach. 

The questions to me revolve around whether the goal is to push information, convince people to read information, have a way to answer questions, or get people involved. How do you maximize impact, control costs, and allow for two-way communication?

I don't have the answer yet, it's one of the reasons I'm looking forward to Netroots Nation next week. I'm hoping to come back with ideas. Until then, what are yours? Do you answer your phone? Your door? If someone like me wanted to reach someone like you on a candidate or issue would I be best off calling? emailing? posting to a social network? banging on your door? Or are you someone who only seeks information on your own?

DocJess :: Political Technology

Follow Democratic Convention Watch on Facebook and Twitter. Iphone/Android apps available.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

the technology of the future (0.00 / 0)
with continual video link-ups pretty much wherever we want them, will enable millions and millions to listen and share ideas all at once.

But there is still no replacement for the 1 on 1 approach.


responding (0.00 / 0)
I generally research myself now. It's too easy to mislead, sound like a telemarketer, call in the middle of supper, or seem pushy. There's an ad right now to the right of me about faking caller ID. I spam a lot of e-mails I don't recognize.

Reaching out and REALLY touching... (0.00 / 0)
I thought about this a lot last fall while working the presidential campaign...a month of phone banking and door to door every day can do that for you!  :-)
  The way I see it, the current progression of technology permits people to be personally more remote--capable of screening phone, e-mail, texts, tweets...just as we always were capable of round-filing direct mail or not answering the door bell.  This will ultimately create an information vacuum which will be filled by, in no particular order, blogs, websites, cable, talk radio, people we actually know, print (mostly media).  The Obama campaign was closer, in the primary, to the cutting edge of this "transition in progress" than the traditional Dem party machine approach of Hillary and that fact alone, more than any real or perceived difference in those two individuals, determined the outcome.
  As this continues to evolve it appears to me that the most effective phone banking of old may turn out to be the wave of the future.  Phone banks that have work best callo targeted lists--people who are undecided yet persuadable and ideally already acquainted with the caller.  Yes, it takes an incredible amount of effort over time to build these sorts of lists.  If you have an easier way, I'm all for it!  If this sounds like a precinct committe grass-roots approach, that's because it's precisely what I think will be required to pierce the electronic shields we can put up with increasing ease.
   My thoughts, worth all you paid for them!  :-)
     Dave Finkelnburg


Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account


Currently 1 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Who links to my website?

Sign the Petition (A)
Powered by: SoapBlox