Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW

Health Insurance: Fighting the Lies (Updated 9/14/09)
House Forecast: 242.4 (-14.6)

Senate Forecast: 57.1 (-2.9)



2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated389
Confirmed293
Last Updated 12/21/09

Follow DCW on Twitter
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Gays and the Census

by: DocJess

Tue Jul 07, 2009 at 08:00:00 AM EDT


We reported a couple weeks ago that the Census would be counting married gay couples as married couples. Technology may not catch up in time.

USA Today is reporting that there are several challenges (6 July, page 3A). Currently, the software used by the Census Bureau automatically converts same-sex married couples to unmarried partners.  The last time the census was taken, there were not US states that recognized gay marriage, so this made sense at the time. According to the newspaper, the Census Bureau does not have a high level of confidence that it can update the computers in time. 

While it seems counter-intuitive, there may be reasons to hold off on the changes. Census data is used to do various things, beyond the redistricting on which everyone who reads this site focuses. Amoung them are enforcement of fair housing and equal opportunity laws: if classifying more gay married couples as straight married couples adversely affects the government's ability to enforce fair housing legislation, that would be bad.

The other issue has to do with shared federal data as it relates to family income and family size, in fact, the definition of "family": these areas would have to be reclassified. 

The above three paragraphs are a reporting of the information, basically from Census Bureau sources. I read the article. I typed up the information. I should leave it at that.

But I can't.

It's inexcusable for the Census Bureau to NOT make the changes. And whatever the outcome to the classifications of family demographics, the goal of the decennial enumeration is an honest accounting of people living in the United States. And it is dishonest to say people aren't married when they are. 

In related news, no, there is no progress on the Groves nomination. He's still on anonymous hold courtesy of some coward Senator.  If this reminds you of "double secret probation" from Animal House, you're not alone. 

DocJess :: Gays and the Census
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email



Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 4 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

custom counter

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox