Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW

Health Insurance: Fighting the Lies (Updated 9/14/09)
House Forecast: 242.4 (-14.6)

Senate Forecast: 57.1 (-2.9)



2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated408
Confirmed339
Last Updated 3/12/10

Follow DCW on Twitter
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Twitter and the Washington Post

by: DocJess

Fri Jul 03, 2009 at 05:20:37 AM EDT


DCW was an early Twitter adopter. We have an official Twitter feed, which you can sign up for on the right side bar, and Matt, Oreo and I also have personal feeds. We automatically send out all our posts on the official Twitter feed.

But that's just us. We see the value and the import of Twitter, and have thus been following with interest how Twitter has been reshaping media. To wit: #IranElection was the major source of information not just for regular folks, but also for the MSM. When Michael Jackson passed away last week, the MSM was reporting that he was in a coma, but TMZ posted the sad news, which was then Twittered around the world.

Because Twitter works best when one follows many people, many MSM members of Twitter are following bloggers and others who post a lot of news.

Yesterday, the power of Twitter smacked down the Washington Post in their attempt to create two levels of "news."  It started with a piece in Politico. A lobbyist received a memo from WaPo about how it was going to start holding "salons" where, for $25,000 one could meet with members of the Obama administration, members of Congress, and even WaPo folks for "off the record access." Why? WaPo needs the money. Pure and simple.

Think about it, when a lobbyist provides a memo to a reporter because the lobbyist thinks there is an ethics problem....

Immediately, Twitter picked it up with the hashtage #Wapodeals. It went everywhere, and by the afternoon, WaPo, after stumbling and mumbling, canceled the salons. 

Had the information not been Twittered, it would have stayed with the readers of Politico which, while a great read for political junkies, is not a household source for most "regular" people. Twitter leveled the playing field.  And WaPo lost the ability to create news for those who could pay $25,000 for an evening, and those who could not or would not.

DocJess :: Twitter and the Washington Post
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Okay .. I'll bite (0.00 / 0)
What exactly is your point?
The MAJORITY of people according to a recent poll do 'not' use Twitter and do not 'Tweet'.

Is DCW going to remain an actual 'website' that provides info or DCW going to be a website that pushes us on over to 'Twitter' for our info?   So, basically my question is DCW now trying to become a NON-website and putting its energy into becoming a non-web news source?



OH NO!!! Leah.... (0.00 / 0)
DCW is a blog, has been a blog, and unless we change from blog to "actual website" will always remain that way.

We value our community, and are committed to providing information, and encouraging people to comment and post.

That said, people access DCW in many ways. Some come on a regular or intermittent basis to www.demconwatchblog.com.

Some people never come to the site, but receive all front page posts via email.

Some people use us via an RSS reader or page.

Some people receive our tweets, and then click the link to view the article on the site. Twitter is limited to 140 characters, so we don't actually "post" there -- we instead have a link to the article.

We have an absolute commitment to providing information (most posts), reference (the lists and forecasts), and an occasional bit of snark. We believe in what we do and what we say. Therefore, our goal is to make our information accessible to as many people as possible.

Our email feed, for example, is great for some people who have email access but no web access. (Yes, they exist.)

Our tweets, through the various feeds go out to people who only have a targeted view of what we do. For example, there are political campaigns that follow us on Twitter and only access us for articles on their candidates.

We're trying to take NOTHING away, only to make it easy for more people to find us!  


[ Parent ]
p.s. - Leah (0.00 / 0)
The point is that more and more people are using Twitter. Much of the MSM uses Twitter to GET news sources and items.

In addition, for some things, like the Iran post-election days, it was the ONLY way to get most information. You often, during that time, cited HuffPost, which was one of the places that relied about 99% on Twitter sources.  


[ Parent ]
Um.. yeah... (0.00 / 0)
sure...  HuffPo got a lot of their info from Iran via Twitter and posted it to their WEBSITE -- and the majority of the info was disseminated through their 'website'.

But I think my previous comment was to say to that the majority of folks (in the USA) are 'not' twittering.



[ Parent ]
Not yet (0.00 / 0)
The latest numbers I can find for pure Twitter usage are from May. They don't reflect the recent surge, nor include people who access Twitter through third party apps (and I actually don't know anyone who doesn't have at least partial usage on a third party app) -- and those numbers indicate that 5 million Americans were using Twitter back then. http://brandsavant.com/101/est... It is likely that the number has more than doubled since then, and is certainly on an exponential (as opposed to arithmetic or geometric) trajectory.

Highly viewed Tweeters have more than a million followers. http://twittercounter.com/page...

Remember, a couple of years ago, blogging was nowhere near where it is now.

Finally, HuffPost used web, as we do -- but sent out via Twitter in addition to acquiring data through the medium.

It's a tool. That's all. A way for people who may not "know you" to be able to find you. "You" can be an individual, a media outlet, a blog, a business, anything.  


[ Parent ]
Pet peeve (0.00 / 0)
Oops--you triggered a pet peeve of mine. Well, it wasn't mine originally, but it was a pet peeve of a friend's, and she infected me with it:

Anyway, exponential and geometric growth are the same thing.


[ Parent ]
yes, but... (0.00 / 0)
exponential also sounda a bit 'explosive' :)

[ Parent ]
Downside (0.00 / 0)
And people wonder why print media/news is dying.

Problem I have with the idea of twittering (besides the consumption of time) is the faster dissemination of possible unconfirmed or false news.

I know some of these items can be used for useful tools, but can also expand the power of the nut cases.





Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

custom counter

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox