Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW


2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention Senate Forecast: 54.6 (-4.4)


House Forecast: 231.9 (-25.1)


Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated408
Confirmed339
Last Updated 3/12/10

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

NY Senate Made a Decision

by: DocJess

Wed Jul 01, 2009 at 07:00:00 AM EDT


It opens this way:

WHEREAS the Democratic and Republican Conferences are unable to agree as to who is the validly elected President Pro Tempore and Majority Leader of the New York State Senate; and

WHEREAS in order to move forward with legislation critical to the people of this state, the Democratic Conference and the Republican Conference (which, combined with Senator Espada, identifies themselves as the “Reform Coalition”) are willing to put aside temporarily the dispute over the election of the President Pro Tempore and Majority Leader, and to suspend the Rules of the Senate for the purpose of considering legislation critical to the public and municipalities of the
State;

Yup, this is the proposed "Bipartisan Operating Agreement for the NY Senate."

If you want more background, you can click here. If you want to stay in the present, yesterday the NY Senate was passing bills 32-0 because the Republicans didn't show up. What's that you say? But there are only 31 Democrats in the NY Senate? Jimmy Velkind has this:

Senator Frank Padavan walked through the back of the chamber, Democrats say. He was spotted by several people (although I didn't see him), and journal clerks counted him as a present as Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins gaveled in and led the pledge. His presence, however brief, apparently, gives the Democrats the 32nd vote they need for a quorum.

Then again, Frank claims he wasn't really there, he was just looking for a cup of coffee. It might have been a soda. Depends if you believe the reporters who talked to him, or the affadavit he signed. 

After the jump, another idea. 

DocJess :: NY Senate Made a Decision

There is a great proposal for the NY Senate, which comes from Adama at The Albany Project: 

I'm sorry that I have to say this, because I know that there are some people with excellent intentions who are working on the problem. But it's become increasingly clear that there is no scenario under which the two sides in the State Senate fight are going to put together a reasonable power sharing agreement. Several have been proposed, and then immediately shot down, because no one appears interested in actual governing.[...]

I'm hereby calling on the entire New York State Senate to resign, effective immediately.

Every member of the chamber, go home. Have the Governor call a special election, complete with primaries, for all the Senate seats. The current senators can run to get their jobs back if they like, but let's allow the voters to decide who they want running this thing. Everyone is at exactly equal risk--the only thing that you have to be judged on is how you've conducted yourself.

Believe me, I'm under no illusions that this will actually happen. But at this point it doesn't seem any more unlikely than a power sharing agreement that will do anything other than put the entire state on hold until 2010.

 

Follow DemConWatch on Facebook and Twitter

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Parliamentary Government (0.00 / 0)
The New York Senate fiasco is one of the reasons that I am generally in favor of the Parliamentary form of government.  It wouldn't be a question of asking all of the members of the Senate to resign.  Either they could get their act together and form a working majority or they would be forced to hold new elections.  Amazing how that sword hanging over the head can reduce deadlocks.




Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Xmarks Top Site in Liberal Blogs

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox