Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW


2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention Senate Forecast: 54.6 (-4.4)


House Forecast: 231.9 (-25.1)


Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated408
Confirmed339
Last Updated 3/12/10

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Why we're not at 60

by: DocJess

Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 20:54:00 PM EDT


Congrats to our newest Senator. It's about time (and a waste of ONE MILLION IIE dollars.)

But before we rest on our supermajority, we're honestly not there yet. Despite the fact that Senator Byrd is out of the hospital, as Oreo Quick Hit earlier,  he is recuperating from MRSA. He may not be back soon. Further, Senator Kennedy is not generally at work. While he has shown up for certain votes, there is a reality that he may not be able to attend all the important votes in the future. I'm not trying to be a naysayer, but there is a reality here. The physical distance of these two men brings our actual number down to 58. 

Further, Democrats are not monolithic. The Climate Bill will be a hard sell in the Senate, as will EFCA. And that's not to mention the dueling health care legislation packets (that no one reads.) Mary Landrieu? Blanche Lincoln? Max Baucus? I'm not counting on them for climate, card check, health care, or most anything on the progressive agenda. 

Arlen Specter is home this week, and he made a speech to a small audience on Monday (no cameras, no press) and he told them that while he was in favour of a public option, in his mind, nothing was off the table. Not to mention the fact that Joe Lieberman has broken a lot of hearts...even Dianne Feinstein was on the Sunday shows saying she wasn't so sure about a public option in the Senate. 

I bring this up not to diminish Senator Franken's win, but to remind everyone that just because 60 people comprise the Democratic caucus in the Senate, it is still incumbent upon each and every one of us to remember to call and write our Senators and tell them which issues matter to us. And where we stand. 

The agenda is too important to take anything for granted.

DocJess :: Why we're not at 60

Follow DemConWatch on Facebook and Twitter

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I know (0.00 / 0)
I know what you mean, it seems like everyone on MSNBC who talked about 60 votes came back to Blanche Lincoln as the Democrat who would defect on a party-line vote. One of my Senators, one who's most likely to sink the ship... : ( But I'll be doing all I can to poke and prod her on the issues to at least tell her some of her constituents would like her to act like a real Democrat. And that I vote.

"Is profit and greed the only conceit on a scale between mere prosperity and inhumanity? It may well be." -Bad Religion

Filibuster is not voting though (0.00 / 0)
Remember though, a filibuster is not the same thing as voting. Sixty votes are needed to close debate on a subject, 50 votes are still needed to pass most bills. A Senator could vote for cloture, but ultimately vote against a bill (this happens all of the time). I think that is what gets lost in the media's discussion of Senate procedures more than anything. Harry Reid and the Democratic Caucus could also force the filibuster. Can the Democrats filibuster themselves on these issues? I don't think they ultimately will . . . but it might take actually allowing a filibuster to happen to get a progressive agenda passed.

One problem with your logic (0.00 / 0)
you make the completely erroneous assumption that Harry Reid has a backbone (not my first choice of words). Why would harry Reid force a filibuster when he can just as easily explain why he didn't want to force a filibuster?

Honest to god when he is up for re-election I am going to be rooting for the republicans. When need some real leadership in the senate more then we need his vote, and we need it BAD.


[ Parent ]



Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Xmarks Top Site in Liberal Blogs

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox