Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW


2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention Senate Forecast: 54.6 (-4.4)


House Forecast: 231.9 (-25.1)


Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated408
Confirmed339
Last Updated 3/12/10

Follow DCW on Twitter
Follow DCW on Facebook
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
St. Louis Channel 2 News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Missouri 2010 Update

by: tmess2

Sun Jun 28, 2009 at 11:47:00 AM EDT


Since it's been a month or so since my last update on things in Missouri, thought it was time to post on how things are developing.

As an initial point to explain the shuffling going on, in 1992 Missouri adopted term limits for our General Assembly.  The term limit amendment limited individuals to serving 4 terms in the House and 2 terms in the Senate (but only counted terms elected after 1992).  Thus (regardless of how many previous terms had been served), a person elected to the House in 1994 could serve in the House until 2002 before reaching the term limit.  If that person then ran for a senate term that year, they could serve in the Senate until 2010 before reaching the term limit.  (Since only half of the Senate is elected at any one time, it was possible that they might have to sit out an election and run in 2004 for the Senate with those people serving until 2012).  In other words, the 2010 election is the first time that we have people who can't run for any position in the General Assembly ever again.

Aside from the term-limited House members running for open Senate Seats, we have three major races that Senate and House members could consider running for.  First, there is, of course, the open U.S. Senate seat.  Second, there is our State Auditor's race.  Finally, with Congressman Blunt running for Senate, there is his now open seat.

On the Democratic side, while not final since filing doesn't take place until late February and March, it seems that things have cleared out for Robin Carnahan, the Secretary of State, to run for the Senate seat.  Likewise, State Auditor Susan Montee is unlikely to get serious primary opposition.  Given the fact that Representative Blunt's district (the seventh) has a PVI of R+17 , it is unlikely that the Democratic candidate (whomever that may end up being) will win barring a large field on the Republican side allowing a candidate even crazier than the Republican base to win.

On the Republican side, things are more interesting.  As was the situation in my first post on Missouri, we are still waiting to hear what Sarah Steelman will do.  What has changed since my more recent post is the situation with the moderate establishment and Ambassador Schweich.

After several weeks of the Ambassador being raised as a potential senate candidate, a deal was reached between the different branches of the Washington Republican establishment to unify behind Roy Blunt for Senate and Ambassador Schweich for State Auditor.  Only problem is that nobody told the Missouri establishment.  Ambassador Schweich is currently looking at a hotly contested primary against the chair of the House Budget Committee and Representative Cynthia Davis of Countdown with Keith Olbermann fame.

tmess2 :: Missouri 2010 Update

Having already served as State Treasurer, it is unlikely that Ms. Steelman will get into the State Auditor's race.  That leaves her to consider the Senate race and the Congressional race.  Ms. Steelman has two problems.  First, if she loses either race, she is essentially done as a serious candidate.  Second, she doens't live in the Congressional District. While residency in the district is not legally required, folks tend to not like voting for someone who doesn't.

On the positive side for a race for Congress, Ms. Steelman did well in the Seventh District in her losing effort to win the Republican Primary for Governor in 2008 despite the establishment backing her opponent.  In addition, the field is beginning to look crowded which means that the advantage of name recognition may outweigh the disadvantage of not being from the district.

Rumors continue to fly as to which option Ms. Steelman will take (or if she will sit out the cycle entirely and wait for another seat to open up after re-districting, probably the eighth or the fourth or a combined eighth and fourth).

Regardless of what Ms. Steelman does, the general election still looks likely to be Representative Blunt against Secretary Carnahan.  Right now, I would say that this race leans Democratic.  Representative Blunt has a lot of negatives from his time in Washington.  However, it may come down to whether 2010 is a good year for Democrats.  If the economy does not recover quickly, this race may migrate to lean Republican by November 2010.

Follow DemConWatch on Facebook and Twitter

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email



Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter
DemConWatch on Facebook


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Xmarks Top Site in Liberal Blogs

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox