Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW

Health Insurance: Fighting the Lies (Updated 9/14/09)
House Forecast: 242.4 (-14.6)

Senate Forecast: 57.1 (-2.9)



2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated389
Confirmed293
Last Updated 12/21/09

Follow DCW on Twitter
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

Matt, Oreo, DCW and the Superdelegates

by: DocJess

Fri Jun 05, 2009 at 04:29:19 AM EDT


Yesterday, HuffPost had an article on superdelegates. There are a few things they didn't mention.

There's a backstory to how DCW came to be, and how it came to be "THE" source for superdelegates. I'll leave that to history, because eventually there will be a lot of books on the intricacies of the 2008 election.

What history will say is that there were these two guys who, first, KNEW that the superdelegate race would matter. Not everyone did (most famously, Mark Penn.) They then committed to tracking not the NUMBER of superdelegates, but the number by NAME. They developed colour-coded lists, and when they said that person A stood with candidate B, they had proof. (No matter how many times the delegate may have changed his or her mind.) DCW was the only place with names. Everyone has guestimates, DCW had actual facts.

The list work itself was technically painful, as well as painstaking, owing to the issues with working with tables in Blogger. Plus, the lists needed daily hourly work and updates. It took a lot of time. And while, yes, Matt and Oreo are political junkies, they also both have actual lives. (Honest: jobs, families, and theoretically a need for sleep.)

In addition to the superdelegates, there was the research they did on the convention itself. And, believe it or not, Matt originally created this site as a place for anything and everything about the convention itself: site selection to execution, with no detail spared. This was the first place to publish that the acceptance speech would be at the stadium. It was written as a rumour, but Oreo had actual confirmation.

I joined Matt and Oreo last June to help with the convention posts. As I told them then, I stand in awe of the work that they did: then, now, and always. They showed a commitment to truth and transparency, their work was meticulous, honest, and devoid of any personal leanings. At a time when the superdelegate race mattered, for the only time in history, and the mainstream press fell down on the job, Matt and Oreo spent hours on hours on data collection, write-ups and tracking. No one else did what they did. 

In May of 2008, a piece came out with video of the NBC room where they kept their superdelegate lists, in hand-writing, on big pieces of paper, on the walls. I had the opportunity to ask Chuck Todd why NBC didn't use spreadsheets, like DCW did. He assured me that Tim Russert insisted they have spreadsheets. And that they really did. I asked him why they didn't publish the actual names, and he mumbled something about that not being the way they decided to go. It was understood implicitly that for the MSM "relationships with sources" trumped the public's right to know.

Matt and Oreo did it right. 

Per the numbers, millions of people viewed the work that they did. We, the political junkies, have always appreciated it. My guess is that history will, too. Because of Matt and Oreo, we all knew what we would not have known otherwise.

I know I speak for millions when I say: thanks, guys. It would have been a whole other primary season without you.

Update from Matt: Kudos to Oreo, who first came up with the idea of publishing the list, based on an early list of congressional endorsements from, I think, Roll Call. It first went up just around the Iowa caucuses, and honestly, at the time, we had no idea superdelegates would matter. Good thing we were wrong!

DocJess :: Matt, Oreo, DCW and the Superdelegates
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
thank you (4.00 / 1)
i just wanted to say a big thank you for all the work you guys put in on that front.  your blog was a daily must read for me throughout the campaign sorting spin from statements of support.  Plus thought your presidential forecast charts (like: http://www.demconwatchblog.com... were some of the most resourceful on the web.  

I remember when that NBC behind the scenes vid came out.  It was ridiculous.  You guys were leagues and leagues ahead of them!  

kudos again!!  


Here, here! (0.00 / 0)
I started following your blog too to get the most up to date superdelegate counts, eschewing other sites which either cited to you (like wikipedia), or were too frustrating in not being accurate (New york Times e.g.).  I also enjoyed scouring the internet for new endorsements to provide you with.  I have become a devoted follower of your posts. Thank you very much! Anne

Thank You! (0.00 / 0)
It was your tracking of the delegates in the primaries and the continual update of the polls by state and source that has you as my go to source.  Thank you for all!

3 cheers (0.00 / 0)
We can't thank you enough for everything. What were you sleeping for? :D It was hard not to get personally caught up in the thick of the primaries, but you managed.




Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

custom counter

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox