Welcome to DCW

Donate to DCW

Health Insurance: Fighting the Lies (Updated 9/14/09)
House Forecast: 242.4 (-14.6)

Senate Forecast: 57.1 (-2.9)



2012 Democratic Convention
2012 Republican Convention
Primary Calendar
List of Key Nominees
Confirmation Hearing Schedule
Ambassador Nominations

Nomination Count
Nominated408
Confirmed339
Last Updated 3/12/10

Follow DCW on Twitter
A Guide to DemConWatch
Tags
FAQ
2008 Democratic Primary Links
2008 Democratic National Convention Links
DemConWatch Archives '05-'08
DemConWatch Speeches
Inauguration Information
DCW Store

HOME
Mobile Version


Search


Advanced Search
Contributors:
MattOreo
DocJess

This site is not affiliated with the DNC, DNCC, or any campaign.

Email us at




Blog Roll
Frontloading HQ
The Field
MyDD
Swing State Project
DemNotes
DemRulz

DCW in the News
AP
Politico
Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
NPR
Wired
US News & World Report

BREAKING - Arlen Specter to Return to the Democratic Party (UPDATED)

by: DocJess

Tue Apr 28, 2009 at 12:14:49 PM EDT


First reported earlier today by Human Events, now confirmed by Politico.

Details to follow as they either become available, or we find out this is an untrue rumour.

UPDATE: Arlen's Press Release

Statement by Senator Arlen Specter

I have been a Republican since 1966. I have been working extremely hard for the Party, for its candidates and for the ideals of a Republican Party whose tent is big enough to welcome diverse points of view. While I have been comfortable being a Republican, my Party has not defined who I am. I have taken each issue one at a time and have exercised independent judgment to do what I thought was best for Pennsylvania and the nation.

Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans.

When I supported the stimulus package, I knew that it would not be popular with the Republican Party. But, I saw the stimulus as necessary to lessen the risk of a far more serious recession than we are now experiencing.

Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable. On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania.

I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary.

I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election.

I deeply regret that I will be disappointing many friends and supporters. I can understand their disappointment. I am also disappointed that so many in the Party I have worked for for more than four decades do not want me to be their candidate. It is very painful on both sides. I thank specially Senators McConnell and Cornyn for their forbearance.

I am not making this decision because there are no important and interesting opportunities outside the Senate. I take on this complicated run for re-election because I am deeply concerned about the future of our country and I believe I have a significant contribution to make on many of the key issues of the day, especially medical research. NIH funding has saved or lengthened thousands of lives, including mine, and much more needs to be done. And my seniority is very important to continue to bring important projects vital to Pennsylvania's economy.

I am taking this action now because there are fewer than thirteen months to the 2010 Pennsylvania Primary and there is much to be done in preparation for that election. Upon request, I will return campaign contributions contributed during this cycle.

While each member of the Senate caucuses with his Party, what each of us hopes to accomplish is distinct from his party affiliation. The American people do not care which Party solves the problems confronting our nation. And no Senator, no matter how loyal he is to his Party, should or would put party loyalty above his duty to the state and nation.

My change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Unlike Senator Jeffords' switch which changed party control, I will not be an automatic 60th vote for cloture. For example, my position on Employees Free Choice (Card Check) will not change.

Whatever my party affiliation, I will continue to be guided by President Kennedy's statement that sometimes Party asks too much. When it does, I will continue my independent voting and follow my conscience on what I think is best for Pennsylvania and America. 

DocJess :: BREAKING - Arlen Specter to Return to the Democratic Party (UPDATED)
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
PA reaction? (0.00 / 0)
DocJess:
I was hoping you would insert a more personal reaction.  I don't remember why, but I thought there were some major things that Spector did in the late 80's early 90's that would have you work to oppose him.  Who do you think should be the Dem nominee in 2010?  Specter offers seniority, do you have a better idea.

Clearly this puts Toomey into the general election.  The question is who does he face?


Follow-Up (0.00 / 0)
Peter --

I actually have that planned for Sunday with the Senators - it's a busy week with all the flu information. And yes, I DO have an opinion!  


[ Parent ]
of course (0.00 / 0)
Of course, I KNOW you have an opinion and I am dying to hear it.  On one of the chats at washingtonpost.com, the consensus was that Gov. Rendell must have made a deal that involved helping to clear the primary of serious challengers.

Remember, I live in Nebraska and have Ben Nelson.  With that said, I don't think the Dems could elect anyone farther to the left than Nelson.  (Ditto North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, etc.)

Obviously, I could see how Dem activists would like to have a stronger voice for their Senator over the next six years.  

By the way, what are Rendell's long term plans?  Does he move to take this seat in 2016 or something else?


[ Parent ]
Wow! (0.00 / 0)
I really didn't expect this. One of the Maine Senators, maybe.

So Specter has said he won't change on EFCA, and will not be an "automatic" vote for cloture on any measure. And I respect that. But for any Senator, there are votes that they would make differently if they switch parties and ones where their party affiliation doesn't matter.

For Specter, what votes does this likely cause him to switch on? The budget, I would think, although he might try to engineer some modest changes. What else?





Menu


Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Make a New Account
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.



Subscribe to Posts

DemConWatch on Twitter


View blog authority

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

custom counter

Who links to my website?

Powered by: SoapBlox